<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 334 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93199</link>
    <description>Light petroleum gas ammonia tanker bodies mounted on duty-paid chassis were classifiable under Heading 8707.00, because bodies built on customer-supplied chassis had already been accepted as falling within that tariff heading. The corresponding small scale exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. was also available, as the exemption conditions were otherwise satisfied. On that basis, the appellate authority&#039;s view was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:40:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 334 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93199</link>
      <description>Light petroleum gas ammonia tanker bodies mounted on duty-paid chassis were classifiable under Heading 8707.00, because bodies built on customer-supplied chassis had already been accepted as falling within that tariff heading. The corresponding small scale exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. was also available, as the exemption conditions were otherwise satisfied. On that basis, the appellate authority&#039;s view was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>