https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93183 The Tribunal criticized the Addl. Commissioner for disregarding judicial discipline and failing to follow established legal principles in determining redemption fines for imported used diesel engines. The Tribunal found the Addl. Commissioner's reliance on discretionary jurisdiction and lack of reasoning in the order unacceptable. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, remitting the case for redetermination of the fine, emphasizing adherence to precedent and consideration of cited cases. The Tribunal highlighted the necessity of providing reasons in judgments and directed the Chief Commissioner of Customs to expedite the proceedings due to significant demurrage costs incurred by the appellants. en-us Fri, 12 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Nov 2011 18:07:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93183 The Tribunal criticized the Addl. Commissioner for disregarding judicial discipline and failing to follow established legal principles in determining redemption fines for imported used diesel engines. The Tribunal found the Addl. Commissioner's reliance on discretionary jurisdiction and lack of reasoning in the order unacceptable. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, remitting the case for redetermination of the fine, emphasizing adherence to precedent and consideration of cited cases. The Tribunal highlighted the necessity of providing reasons in judgments and directed the Chief Commissioner of Customs to expedite the proceedings due to significant demurrage costs incurred by the appellants. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 12 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93183