<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 316 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93180</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the adjudication order by the Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh. The Tribunal upheld the decision to consider fresh evidence regarding alleged clandestine production and removal of goods supplied to Government authorities. After analyzing the evidence, including production records and inspection reports, the Tribunal found no discrepancies in ordered, produced, and delivered quantities. The Tribunal also rejected objections regarding deduction of sales tax and claiming deduction towards freight, emphasizing the lack of merit in the Revenue&#039;s arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:59:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 316 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93180</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the adjudication order by the Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh. The Tribunal upheld the decision to consider fresh evidence regarding alleged clandestine production and removal of goods supplied to Government authorities. After analyzing the evidence, including production records and inspection reports, the Tribunal found no discrepancies in ordered, produced, and delivered quantities. The Tribunal also rejected objections regarding deduction of sales tax and claiming deduction towards freight, emphasizing the lack of merit in the Revenue&#039;s arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>