<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 428 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93164</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the two manufacturers were not required to club their clearances under excise law as there was no evidence of financial flow back to the unnamed manufacturer. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the manufacturers and distributor were not related persons with mutual interests, as there was no proof of direct or indirect business connections. The Tribunal set aside the Collector&#039;s decision and allowed the appeals based on the lack of evidence supporting the clubbing of clearances and relatedness between the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:54:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 428 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93164</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the two manufacturers were not required to club their clearances under excise law as there was no evidence of financial flow back to the unnamed manufacturer. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the manufacturers and distributor were not related persons with mutual interests, as there was no proof of direct or indirect business connections. The Tribunal set aside the Collector&#039;s decision and allowed the appeals based on the lack of evidence supporting the clubbing of clearances and relatedness between the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>