<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 421 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93156</link>
    <description>Chemically treated Weldgrade Ilmenite, after upgrading, roasting, acid treatment and MnO2 treatment, was classified by reference to its character and admitted use as a flux for welding electrodes. The product had ceased to be natural ilmenite ore and was not titanium oxide in pure form, so the specific heading for preparations used as cores or coatings for welding electrodes or rods applied. The residual chemical-products heading was rejected because the item answered a more specific tariff description, and the HSN Explanatory Notes supported that interpretation. Classification under the welding-electrode heading was therefore sustained, while the alternate headings were excluded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:29:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 421 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93156</link>
      <description>Chemically treated Weldgrade Ilmenite, after upgrading, roasting, acid treatment and MnO2 treatment, was classified by reference to its character and admitted use as a flux for welding electrodes. The product had ceased to be natural ilmenite ore and was not titanium oxide in pure form, so the specific heading for preparations used as cores or coatings for welding electrodes or rods applied. The residual chemical-products heading was rejected because the item answered a more specific tariff description, and the HSN Explanatory Notes supported that interpretation. Classification under the welding-electrode heading was therefore sustained, while the alternate headings were excluded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>