<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 326 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93148</link>
    <description>Marketability remains a prerequisite for excisability, so untrimmed sheets were not liable to duty where no evidence showed they were marketable; their captive use in making trimmed sheets also could not be counted to deny small-scale exemption under Notification No. 1/93. Unwrought copper and copper slabs qualified for exemption under Notification No. 42/94 because the notification did not require direct use in utensils and handicrafts, and use as basic material for exempt end-use was sufficient. Copper slag/dross was not excisable because dross and skimmings are not goods. The demand therefore failed on all disputed items.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:11:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 326 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93148</link>
      <description>Marketability remains a prerequisite for excisability, so untrimmed sheets were not liable to duty where no evidence showed they were marketable; their captive use in making trimmed sheets also could not be counted to deny small-scale exemption under Notification No. 1/93. Unwrought copper and copper slabs qualified for exemption under Notification No. 42/94 because the notification did not require direct use in utensils and handicrafts, and use as basic material for exempt end-use was sufficient. Copper slag/dross was not excisable because dross and skimmings are not goods. The demand therefore failed on all disputed items.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>