<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 253 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93143</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on duty-paid inputs used to repair defective transformers cleared without duty could not be retained where statutory records did not disclose input consumption or credit availed. The unsupported assertion that assessable value included warranty and repair costs did not establish that credit reversal was unnecessary, so the duty demand was sustained on merits. Blank register entries and inadequate disclosure of duty-free clearances constituted suppression of material facts with intent to evade duty, permitting the extended limitation period. Earlier notices for other periods did not change that conclusion. Duty and penalty were sustained, and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:59:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 253 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93143</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on duty-paid inputs used to repair defective transformers cleared without duty could not be retained where statutory records did not disclose input consumption or credit availed. The unsupported assertion that assessable value included warranty and repair costs did not establish that credit reversal was unnecessary, so the duty demand was sustained on merits. Blank register entries and inadequate disclosure of duty-free clearances constituted suppression of material facts with intent to evade duty, permitting the extended limitation period. Earlier notices for other periods did not change that conclusion. Duty and penalty were sustained, and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>