<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 209 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93108</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was treated as admissible on caustic soda, activated carbon, filter aid and filter paper used in manufacturing aerated waters because the materials were shown to form part of the production process and credit could not be denied on a narrow view of their role. Credit was also treated as admissible on old and used glass bottles, both in factory stock and with dealers, because Rule 57H was read as containing two disjunctive qualifying conditions and not as limiting credit to fresh containers. The governing principle stated is that a rule cannot be restricted by adding requirements not found in its text, and used containers may qualify if they satisfy the substantive conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 14:23:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 209 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93108</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was treated as admissible on caustic soda, activated carbon, filter aid and filter paper used in manufacturing aerated waters because the materials were shown to form part of the production process and credit could not be denied on a narrow view of their role. Credit was also treated as admissible on old and used glass bottles, both in factory stock and with dealers, because Rule 57H was read as containing two disjunctive qualifying conditions and not as limiting credit to fresh containers. The governing principle stated is that a rule cannot be restricted by adding requirements not found in its text, and used containers may qualify if they satisfy the substantive conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>