<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93103</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to deny the concessional rate of duty on imported coal, emphasizing the necessity of meeting specified quality criteria outlined in the ad hoc exemption order for availing duty benefits. Compliance with tender specifications and quality requirements was deemed essential, with the Tribunal confirming the enforcement of bank guarantees to recover the duty differential amount due to the coal not meeting the specified conditions for concessional duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:30:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93103</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to deny the concessional rate of duty on imported coal, emphasizing the necessity of meeting specified quality criteria outlined in the ad hoc exemption order for availing duty benefits. Compliance with tender specifications and quality requirements was deemed essential, with the Tribunal confirming the enforcement of bank guarantees to recover the duty differential amount due to the coal not meeting the specified conditions for concessional duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>