<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 201 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93082</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to late filing, rejected the request for condonation of delay, and emphasized the Tribunal&#039;s obligation to address the time bar issue before deciding on the merits of an appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:13:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 201 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93082</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to late filing, rejected the request for condonation of delay, and emphasized the Tribunal&#039;s obligation to address the time bar issue before deciding on the merits of an appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>