<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 335 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93051</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the imported goods were rightly classified under Heading 9021.90 as orthopaedic appliances for pain relief and injury treatment, based on the main function of heat generation rather than solely support. The decision was supported by international rulings and case law, leading to the allowance of the appeal and potential consequential relief for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 18:49:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 335 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93051</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the imported goods were rightly classified under Heading 9021.90 as orthopaedic appliances for pain relief and injury treatment, based on the main function of heat generation rather than solely support. The decision was supported by international rulings and case law, leading to the allowance of the appeal and potential consequential relief for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>