https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93040 A custom house agent licence suspension was examined under Regulation 21 on two grounds: the earlier revocation and untested allegations of misconduct did not, by themselves, justify suspension, because there was no preliminary enquiry or prima facie material supporting peremptory action. However, the company had continued to function after the death of its only qualified person, leaving it without the prescribed qualification to act as a CHA, and it also failed to disclose that material change to Customs. That continuing lack of qualification and non-disclosure justified the departmental suspension, so the licence suspension was sustained. en-us Mon, 30 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Nov 2011 18:22:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93040 A custom house agent licence suspension was examined under Regulation 21 on two grounds: the earlier revocation and untested allegations of misconduct did not, by themselves, justify suspension, because there was no preliminary enquiry or prima facie material supporting peremptory action. However, the company had continued to function after the death of its only qualified person, leaving it without the prescribed qualification to act as a CHA, and it also failed to disclose that material change to Customs. That continuing lack of qualification and non-disclosure justified the departmental suspension, so the licence suspension was sustained. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 30 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93040