<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 379 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93027</link>
    <description>Emulsifiers were treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 101/66-C.E. because the notification expressly covered emulsifiers, wetting out agents, softeners and similar preparations, and did not require them to be surface-active preparations in their own right. Although the tariff heading for organic surface-active agents was broad enough to include emulsifiers, that classification did not displace the specific exemption. The products had emerged from duty-paid organic surface-active agents and continued to retain their character as emulsifiers, so the Revenue&#039;s objection was rejected and the exemption was held applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 17:33:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 379 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93027</link>
      <description>Emulsifiers were treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 101/66-C.E. because the notification expressly covered emulsifiers, wetting out agents, softeners and similar preparations, and did not require them to be surface-active preparations in their own right. Although the tariff heading for organic surface-active agents was broad enough to include emulsifiers, that classification did not displace the specific exemption. The products had emerged from duty-paid organic surface-active agents and continued to retain their character as emulsifiers, so the Revenue&#039;s objection was rejected and the exemption was held applicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>