<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 354 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93002</link>
    <description>Clinker manufactured within the factory and wholly consumed captively in the manufacture of cement was held not liable to duty under Explanation VI to Notification No. 1/93. Earlier Tribunal rulings were treated as settling that goods produced in the factory and fully used in the manufacture of specified goods are not subjected to duty in such captive-use situations. The argument that the explanation merely excluded value and did not confer exemption was rejected, and no duty was leviable on the clinker used captively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:23:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 354 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93002</link>
      <description>Clinker manufactured within the factory and wholly consumed captively in the manufacture of cement was held not liable to duty under Explanation VI to Notification No. 1/93. Earlier Tribunal rulings were treated as settling that goods produced in the factory and fully used in the manufacture of specified goods are not subjected to duty in such captive-use situations. The argument that the explanation merely excluded value and did not confer exemption was rejected, and no duty was leviable on the clinker used captively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>