<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 306 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92988</link>
    <description>After denial of exemption under Notification No. 202/88, the Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s claim for deemed Modvat credit had to be considered if otherwise admissible. It noted that the matter had already been remanded for re-quantification and that the Assistant Collector had not yet readjudicated the dispute, so the earlier Tribunal principle governed the issue. The Assistant Collector was therefore directed to consider the plea for deemed Modvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:24:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 306 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92988</link>
      <description>After denial of exemption under Notification No. 202/88, the Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s claim for deemed Modvat credit had to be considered if otherwise admissible. It noted that the matter had already been remanded for re-quantification and that the Assistant Collector had not yet readjudicated the dispute, so the earlier Tribunal principle governed the issue. The Assistant Collector was therefore directed to consider the plea for deemed Modvat credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>