<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 248 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92976</link>
    <description>Under Notification No. 175/86-C.E., clearances of excisable goods falling under more than one tariff heading could be aggregated for the overall small-scale exemption limit, while remaining subject to the notification&#039;s individual-heading ceiling. The Tribunal found no material error in the appellate authority&#039;s reading of the notification or its reliance on earlier precedent. The Revenue&#039;s objection was based on an incorrect construction of the appellate order and did not disturb the settled interpretation of the exemption scheme. The challenge to the grant of small-scale exemption therefore failed, and the appellate order was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:42:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 248 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92976</link>
      <description>Under Notification No. 175/86-C.E., clearances of excisable goods falling under more than one tariff heading could be aggregated for the overall small-scale exemption limit, while remaining subject to the notification&#039;s individual-heading ceiling. The Tribunal found no material error in the appellate authority&#039;s reading of the notification or its reliance on earlier precedent. The Revenue&#039;s objection was based on an incorrect construction of the appellate order and did not disturb the settled interpretation of the exemption scheme. The challenge to the grant of small-scale exemption therefore failed, and the appellate order was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>