https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92970 A reference application was held not maintainable where the impugned order was passed under the second proviso to Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and merely declined to admit the appeal. The Tribunal reasoned that the statutory reference remedy under Section 35G is confined to orders passed under Section 35C, and an order refusing admission under Section 35B does not answer that description. The application was therefore rejected. en-us Wed, 16 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:20:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92970 A reference application was held not maintainable where the impugned order was passed under the second proviso to Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and merely declined to admit the appeal. The Tribunal reasoned that the statutory reference remedy under Section 35G is confined to orders passed under Section 35C, and an order refusing admission under Section 35B does not answer that description. The application was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 16 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92970