<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 239 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92967</link>
    <description>The appellants sought waiver of duty demand and penalty, claiming lack of opportunity to defend due to inadequate document provision. The Revenue argued documents were supplied, but the court found key records were not given pre-order. The balance favored appellants, leading to waiver of duty demand and penalty, with recovery stay pending appeal. The court directed a fair appeal hearing date for effective case presentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:12:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 239 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92967</link>
      <description>The appellants sought waiver of duty demand and penalty, claiming lack of opportunity to defend due to inadequate document provision. The Revenue argued documents were supplied, but the court found key records were not given pre-order. The balance favored appellants, leading to waiver of duty demand and penalty, with recovery stay pending appeal. The court directed a fair appeal hearing date for effective case presentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>