<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 323 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92936</link>
    <description>Where a company is under liquidation, Rule 22 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules provides that an appeal abates unless the Official Liquidator applies for its continuation. As no such application was filed by the Official Liquidator in this matter, the appeal and the stay application were treated as abated and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:59:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 323 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92936</link>
      <description>Where a company is under liquidation, Rule 22 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules provides that an appeal abates unless the Official Liquidator applies for its continuation. As no such application was filed by the Official Liquidator in this matter, the appeal and the stay application were treated as abated and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>