<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 290 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92929</link>
    <description>The appeal was successful as the Tribunal adjusted the redemption fine for the import of Cassia to 75% of the CIF value, in line with consistent precedent set by previous Tribunal decisions. The judgment highlights the importance of maintaining consistency in applying established ratios for redemption fines, regardless of the presence of heavy demurrage, to ensure fair treatment across similar cases and uphold the rule of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:41:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 290 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92929</link>
      <description>The appeal was successful as the Tribunal adjusted the redemption fine for the import of Cassia to 75% of the CIF value, in line with consistent precedent set by previous Tribunal decisions. The judgment highlights the importance of maintaining consistency in applying established ratios for redemption fines, regardless of the presence of heavy demurrage, to ensure fair treatment across similar cases and uphold the rule of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>