<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 287 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92926</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalties was granted where the assessee showed a prima facie case, including that the net revenue effect would not materially differ and that exemption availment was optional. The Tribunal found that the impugned order had not adequately examined these considerations and, on that basis, relieved the assessee from deposit pending appeal, subject to maintaining a specified balance in the Modvat account until final disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:31:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 287 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92926</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalties was granted where the assessee showed a prima facie case, including that the net revenue effect would not materially differ and that exemption availment was optional. The Tribunal found that the impugned order had not adequately examined these considerations and, on that basis, relieved the assessee from deposit pending appeal, subject to maintaining a specified balance in the Modvat account until final disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>