<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 286 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92925</link>
    <description>Excise assessable value does not include the excess of equalised freight collected over actual freight incurred, because duty is chargeable on manufacture and not on the dealer&#039;s transportation profit. A fixed freight scheme may be excluded from valuation to the extent it represents genuine freight, while only the excess collection is outside the assessable value. The impugned order was set aside for not addressing binding precedents relied on by the assessee, and the appeals succeeded on that valuation principle.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:30:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 286 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92925</link>
      <description>Excise assessable value does not include the excess of equalised freight collected over actual freight incurred, because duty is chargeable on manufacture and not on the dealer&#039;s transportation profit. A fixed freight scheme may be excluded from valuation to the extent it represents genuine freight, while only the excess collection is outside the assessable value. The impugned order was set aside for not addressing binding precedents relied on by the assessee, and the appeals succeeded on that valuation principle.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>