<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (1) TMI 249 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92905</link>
    <description>The Collector (Appeals) held recovery notices invalid as they were issued after the rescission of Notification 201/79. The Tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s entitlement to credit on duty paid on malt extract, rejecting the department&#039;s recovery claim post-rescission. Precedents and legal principles supported honoring rights accrued under a notification even after its repeal, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and upholding the respondent&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 18:32:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (1) TMI 249 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92905</link>
      <description>The Collector (Appeals) held recovery notices invalid as they were issued after the rescission of Notification 201/79. The Tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s entitlement to credit on duty paid on malt extract, rejecting the department&#039;s recovery claim post-rescission. Precedents and legal principles supported honoring rights accrued under a notification even after its repeal, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and upholding the respondent&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>