https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92900 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal against the order-in-appeal on duty levy for rigid PU foam in thermoware, affirming that the foam was not separately marketable and upholding the decision in favor of the Respondent. The Tribunal emphasized that the foam was an integral part of the final product, following established legal principles and precedents in similar cases. The Department's arguments regarding in-situ manufacturing and marketability were dismissed, and the earlier decision was upheld based on the inseparability of the foam from the thermoware. en-us Fri, 09 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Nov 2011 18:12:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92900 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal against the order-in-appeal on duty levy for rigid PU foam in thermoware, affirming that the foam was not separately marketable and upholding the decision in favor of the Respondent. The Tribunal emphasized that the foam was an integral part of the final product, following established legal principles and precedents in similar cases. The Department's arguments regarding in-situ manufacturing and marketability were dismissed, and the earlier decision was upheld based on the inseparability of the foam from the thermoware. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 09 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92900