https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92897 Edge-cuttings of transmission and conveyor beltings were disputed as classifiable either as strips of non-cellular rubber under CET sub-heading 4008.29 or as waste, parings and scrap of rubber under sub-heading 4004.00, with excisability also in issue. The matter was treated as covered by an earlier bench order in the same line of appeals, which had required the adjudicating authority to examine afresh the plea that the edge-cuttings were not excisable. Consistently, the case was remanded for de novo adjudication after granting the appellants a reasonable opportunity of personal hearing. en-us Wed, 09 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Nov 2011 18:03:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92897 Edge-cuttings of transmission and conveyor beltings were disputed as classifiable either as strips of non-cellular rubber under CET sub-heading 4008.29 or as waste, parings and scrap of rubber under sub-heading 4004.00, with excisability also in issue. The matter was treated as covered by an earlier bench order in the same line of appeals, which had required the adjudicating authority to examine afresh the plea that the edge-cuttings were not excisable. Consistently, the case was remanded for de novo adjudication after granting the appellants a reasonable opportunity of personal hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 09 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92897