<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 467 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92887</link>
    <description>Interest on receivables was treated as a deductible element and excluded from the assessable value. Bank charges for realisation of sale proceeds and discount allowed for transit damage were also accepted as deductible in principle. However, because the factual position regarding bank charges had not been examined by the lower authorities, that item required verification before final relief could be granted, and the matter was remanded for factual determination. The stated principle was that amounts not forming part of the assessable value are deductible, but unresolved factual foundations may require remand before deduction is finally allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 17:35:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 467 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92887</link>
      <description>Interest on receivables was treated as a deductible element and excluded from the assessable value. Bank charges for realisation of sale proceeds and discount allowed for transit damage were also accepted as deductible in principle. However, because the factual position regarding bank charges had not been examined by the lower authorities, that item required verification before final relief could be granted, and the matter was remanded for factual determination. The stated principle was that amounts not forming part of the assessable value are deductible, but unresolved factual foundations may require remand before deduction is finally allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>