https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92869 Calcium carbide manufactured by the respondent was held not to be excisable goods because it lacked marketability in law. The product did not satisfy the commercial purity contemplated by the applicable rules governing calcium carbide, so it was treated as outside the excise charge. The earlier High Court view on the same question was followed, and the departmental challenge failed. en-us Mon, 08 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Nov 2011 16:37:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92869 Calcium carbide manufactured by the respondent was held not to be excisable goods because it lacked marketability in law. The product did not satisfy the commercial purity contemplated by the applicable rules governing calcium carbide, so it was treated as outside the excise charge. The earlier High Court view on the same question was followed, and the departmental challenge failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 08 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92869