<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 194 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92859</link>
    <description>Computer software imported on a hard disk drive was held to be classifiable as recorded media under Heading 85.24, because the essential character of the consignment was the software rather than the physical drive. The fact that the software was stored on a hard disk did not alter its classification, and Chapter Note 6 of Chapter 85 supported treatment of such media under that heading. The goods were therefore assessable at 10% and not under Heading 84.71 as hard disk drives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 194 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92859</link>
      <description>Computer software imported on a hard disk drive was held to be classifiable as recorded media under Heading 85.24, because the essential character of the consignment was the software rather than the physical drive. The fact that the software was stored on a hard disk did not alter its classification, and Chapter Note 6 of Chapter 85 supported treatment of such media under that heading. The goods were therefore assessable at 10% and not under Heading 84.71 as hard disk drives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>