<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 167 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92848</link>
    <description>Waste or rubbish arising in the manufacture of dextrose monohydrate was held not to be excisable merely because it was saleable. The material cleared from the factory was an admixture of spent residues from several inputs, had lost its decolourising and clarifying properties, and was not a distinct marketable product of the chemical industry. On that reasoning, it was not classifiable under Heading 38.23 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and was treated as non-dutiable residue rather than an excisable good.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 14:53:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 167 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92848</link>
      <description>Waste or rubbish arising in the manufacture of dextrose monohydrate was held not to be excisable merely because it was saleable. The material cleared from the factory was an admixture of spent residues from several inputs, had lost its decolourising and clarifying properties, and was not a distinct marketable product of the chemical industry. On that reasoning, it was not classifiable under Heading 38.23 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and was treated as non-dutiable residue rather than an excisable good.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>