https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92847 The Tribunal rejected the plea of limitation as the exact date of deposit was unknown, upheld the payment of Rs. 43,000 as part of the machine's value subject to duty payment, and modified the duty calculation to exclude the 20% differential duty. The appeal was disposed of with these modifications, confirming the Collector's order. en-us Fri, 17 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Nov 2011 14:52:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92847 The Tribunal rejected the plea of limitation as the exact date of deposit was unknown, upheld the payment of Rs. 43,000 as part of the machine's value subject to duty payment, and modified the duty calculation to exclude the 20% differential duty. The appeal was disposed of with these modifications, confirming the Collector's order. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 17 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92847