<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 261 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92835</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was held inadmissible where the assessee relied on an internal requisition slip issued by its head office instead of a prescribed duty paying document. Although the inputs had suffered duty, the credit mechanism required compliance with the statutory document-based procedure, and an internal distribution slip could not substitute for the recognised evidence of duty payment. Public body status did not relax those requirements. The denial of credit was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 13:33:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 261 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92835</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was held inadmissible where the assessee relied on an internal requisition slip issued by its head office instead of a prescribed duty paying document. Although the inputs had suffered duty, the credit mechanism required compliance with the statutory document-based procedure, and an internal distribution slip could not substitute for the recognised evidence of duty payment. Public body status did not relax those requirements. The denial of credit was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>