<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 254 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92828</link>
    <description>Export of birds to Nepal through the Barhni land route, a notified permissible route, could not justify confiscation of the goods or trucks or the imposition of penalties in the absence of any notification, order, or circular prohibiting such export. The record disclosed no governmental ban on exporting ducks and titars through that route, and the assumption of Customs violation was therefore unsupported. On that footing, the confiscation and penalty orders were set aside, and relief was granted to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 13:18:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 254 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92828</link>
      <description>Export of birds to Nepal through the Barhni land route, a notified permissible route, could not justify confiscation of the goods or trucks or the imposition of penalties in the absence of any notification, order, or circular prohibiting such export. The record disclosed no governmental ban on exporting ducks and titars through that route, and the assumption of Customs violation was therefore unsupported. On that footing, the confiscation and penalty orders were set aside, and relief was granted to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>