<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 247 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92821</link>
    <description>Interim protection against recovery of duty and penalty was continued because the rectification of mistake application was pending before a third member and its outcome was treated as central to the dispute. With recovery proceedings already initiated and the ROM expected to be decided shortly, continued stay was considered appropriate until the majority order in the rectification application was pronounced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 13:04:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 247 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92821</link>
      <description>Interim protection against recovery of duty and penalty was continued because the rectification of mistake application was pending before a third member and its outcome was treated as central to the dispute. With recovery proceedings already initiated and the ROM expected to be decided shortly, continued stay was considered appropriate until the majority order in the rectification application was pronounced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>