<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 326 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92778</link>
    <description>The Judge allowed the appeal, remanding the case to the Asst. Commissioner for a comprehensive review. The appellant&#039;s dispute regarding stock figures and calculation errors by Officers was acknowledged. The failure to address crucial aspects by the Asst. Commissioner and Commissioner (Appeals) necessitated a remand for a fair assessment. The decision aimed to ensure the appellant&#039;s defense was properly considered, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice during the fresh adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 10:42:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 326 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92778</link>
      <description>The Judge allowed the appeal, remanding the case to the Asst. Commissioner for a comprehensive review. The appellant&#039;s dispute regarding stock figures and calculation errors by Officers was acknowledged. The failure to address crucial aspects by the Asst. Commissioner and Commissioner (Appeals) necessitated a remand for a fair assessment. The decision aimed to ensure the appellant&#039;s defense was properly considered, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice during the fresh adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>