https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92769 Where an earlier final order rested on a precedent that was later recalled, the foundation of that order was treated as having ceased to survive, making recall of the consequential order appropriate. On parity of reasoning with a connected matter already remanded, the dispute was sent back to the original authority for de novo consideration, with an opportunity of hearing to the applicants. The rectification application succeeded, the earlier order was set aside, and fresh adjudication was directed. en-us Thu, 14 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Nov 2011 18:53:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92769 Where an earlier final order rested on a precedent that was later recalled, the foundation of that order was treated as having ceased to survive, making recall of the consequential order appropriate. On parity of reasoning with a connected matter already remanded, the dispute was sent back to the original authority for de novo consideration, with an opportunity of hearing to the applicants. The rectification application succeeded, the earlier order was set aside, and fresh adjudication was directed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 14 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92769