<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 370 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92745</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal for re-examination of the quantification of duty and classification of goods. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner did not properly classify the goods or determine the assessable value under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The case was remanded to the Commissioner to examine the appellants&#039; contentions regarding the determination of assessable value, quantum of duty, and applicable rate of duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:29:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 370 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92745</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal for re-examination of the quantification of duty and classification of goods. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner did not properly classify the goods or determine the assessable value under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The case was remanded to the Commissioner to examine the appellants&#039; contentions regarding the determination of assessable value, quantum of duty, and applicable rate of duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>