<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 361 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92736</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order. Emphasizing adherence to Section 11A, the Tribunal highlighted the importance of preventing unfair demands exceeding those specified in the notice. The case was remanded for fresh adjudication, granting both parties an opportunity to present their case effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:52:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 361 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92736</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order. Emphasizing adherence to Section 11A, the Tribunal highlighted the importance of preventing unfair demands exceeding those specified in the notice. The case was remanded for fresh adjudication, granting both parties an opportunity to present their case effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>