<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 330 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92727</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 202/88-C.E. was confined to inputs matching the specific descriptions in the notification&#039;s table, and rollable or re-rollable scrap/material did not fall within those eligible inputs. The assessee had the burden to prove strict compliance with the exemption entry, and the invoice descriptions did not establish such entitlement. The claimed benefit therefore failed, and the exemption was not available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:23:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 330 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92727</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 202/88-C.E. was confined to inputs matching the specific descriptions in the notification&#039;s table, and rollable or re-rollable scrap/material did not fall within those eligible inputs. The assessee had the burden to prove strict compliance with the exemption entry, and the invoice descriptions did not establish such entitlement. The claimed benefit therefore failed, and the exemption was not available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>