<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 264 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92694</link>
    <description>A charge of clandestine removal of excisable goods requires positive and reliable evidence of clandestine production, removal, or actual clearance. Cancellation of an invoice, stock verification showing a shortage, proximity between buyer and seller, and other surrounding circumstances were treated as insufficient on their own, where no corroborative documentary or other direct evidence supported the allegation. An explanation that the invoice was cancelled for lack of duty balance and that the goods remained in filtration tanks weakened the inference of clandestine clearance. The adverse finding was therefore unsustainable, and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 14:25:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 264 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92694</link>
      <description>A charge of clandestine removal of excisable goods requires positive and reliable evidence of clandestine production, removal, or actual clearance. Cancellation of an invoice, stock verification showing a shortage, proximity between buyer and seller, and other surrounding circumstances were treated as insufficient on their own, where no corroborative documentary or other direct evidence supported the allegation. An explanation that the invoice was cancelled for lack of duty balance and that the goods remained in filtration tanks weakened the inference of clandestine clearance. The adverse finding was therefore unsustainable, and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>