<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 290 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92683</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to dismiss the appeal, ruling that the cost of bought-out items need not be included in the assessable value if they are not integral parts of the main item, as per Supreme Court precedents. The judgment did not explicitly address the inclusion of installation charges in the assessable value, focusing primarily on the essential nature of bought-out items for effective use.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:13:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 290 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92683</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to dismiss the appeal, ruling that the cost of bought-out items need not be included in the assessable value if they are not integral parts of the main item, as per Supreme Court precedents. The judgment did not explicitly address the inclusion of installation charges in the assessable value, focusing primarily on the essential nature of bought-out items for effective use.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>