<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 305 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92671</link>
    <description>The case involved the importation of a CT Scanner and an Ultrasound Scanner under Customs Notification No. 279/83, with allegations of non-compliance with the post-importation condition of providing free treatment to outdoor patients. The Commissioner ordered confiscation of the scanners and imposed fines, which were challenged before Delhi HC. The appellants argued the absence of a specified time limit for compliance and cited a Tribunal judgment. The Tribunal remanded the matter for detailed examination by the Commissioner to verify compliance and make a decision after allowing the appellants to substantiate their claim, ultimately allowing the appeals for further assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:45:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 305 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92671</link>
      <description>The case involved the importation of a CT Scanner and an Ultrasound Scanner under Customs Notification No. 279/83, with allegations of non-compliance with the post-importation condition of providing free treatment to outdoor patients. The Commissioner ordered confiscation of the scanners and imposed fines, which were challenged before Delhi HC. The appellants argued the absence of a specified time limit for compliance and cited a Tribunal judgment. The Tribunal remanded the matter for detailed examination by the Commissioner to verify compliance and make a decision after allowing the appellants to substantiate their claim, ultimately allowing the appeals for further assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>