<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 302 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92668</link>
    <description>Penalty under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 cannot be fastened on the owner of premises merely because illegal activities occurred there. The record must show that the person was concerned with, aware of, or otherwise linked to the offending conduct. Where no material establishes participation, knowledge, or connection beyond ownership of the premises, penal liability is not sustainable and the penalty must be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:35:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 302 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92668</link>
      <description>Penalty under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 cannot be fastened on the owner of premises merely because illegal activities occurred there. The record must show that the person was concerned with, aware of, or otherwise linked to the offending conduct. Where no material establishes participation, knowledge, or connection beyond ownership of the premises, penal liability is not sustainable and the penalty must be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>