<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 263 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92662</link>
    <description>Modvat credit cannot be denied merely because original duty paying documents were not produced for defacement where the department had already resumed those documents and photocopies were available. In such circumstances, the existence of the duty paid inputs is sufficiently established, and non-production of the originals for defacement does not justify rejection of credit. The operative legal point is that procedural inability to produce originals, when attributable to departmental custody of the documents, is not a valid ground to refuse Modvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:15:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 263 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92662</link>
      <description>Modvat credit cannot be denied merely because original duty paying documents were not produced for defacement where the department had already resumed those documents and photocopies were available. In such circumstances, the existence of the duty paid inputs is sufficiently established, and non-production of the originals for defacement does not justify rejection of credit. The operative legal point is that procedural inability to produce originals, when attributable to departmental custody of the documents, is not a valid ground to refuse Modvat credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>