<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (1) TMI 229 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92658</link>
    <description>Tariff Heading 75.01 was construed to cover nickel waste and scrap arising in the manufacture of nickel articles. The plain meaning of the heading was applied, and the entry was not read as excluding such by-products. On that basis, waste and scrap recovered from nickel article manufacture remained classifiable under the same heading, and the lower authority&#039;s classification was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:08:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (1) TMI 229 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92658</link>
      <description>Tariff Heading 75.01 was construed to cover nickel waste and scrap arising in the manufacture of nickel articles. The plain meaning of the heading was applied, and the entry was not read as excluding such by-products. On that basis, waste and scrap recovered from nickel article manufacture remained classifiable under the same heading, and the lower authority&#039;s classification was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>