<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 189 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92636</link>
    <description>Imported extruded and oriented plastic nets, grids and composites were examined against Sl. No. 13 of Notification No. 15/94-C.E., which covered balconies, balustrades, fencing, gates or similar barriers for CVD exemption. Product catalogues, approval letters, the import licence enclosure and declared end uses showed the goods were polymer nets and grids supplied in running lengths for multiple applications, including builder&#039;s ware, structural use, waste water treatment, architectural use, fencing and barriers. On that material, the goods did not fit the specific notification description, and the earlier letter cited by the importer was not decisive because the later approval and import documents governed the imports. The exemption was therefore unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 10:48:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 189 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92636</link>
      <description>Imported extruded and oriented plastic nets, grids and composites were examined against Sl. No. 13 of Notification No. 15/94-C.E., which covered balconies, balustrades, fencing, gates or similar barriers for CVD exemption. Product catalogues, approval letters, the import licence enclosure and declared end uses showed the goods were polymer nets and grids supplied in running lengths for multiple applications, including builder&#039;s ware, structural use, waste water treatment, architectural use, fencing and barriers. On that material, the goods did not fit the specific notification description, and the earlier letter cited by the importer was not decisive because the later approval and import documents governed the imports. The exemption was therefore unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>