<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 172 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92619</link>
    <description>Excise valuation under the relevant rules permits addition only of consideration flowing directly or indirectly from the buyer under the sale transaction. A government subsidy paid through the purchaser was treated as a separate support arrangement and not part of the rigs&#039; sale price, so it could not be included in assessable value. The article also notes that where the price list and returns were disclosed and approved, a differential duty demand raised nearly two years later could not invoke the extended limitation period absent proof of suppression. The connected duty demand and penalty were therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 172 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92619</link>
      <description>Excise valuation under the relevant rules permits addition only of consideration flowing directly or indirectly from the buyer under the sale transaction. A government subsidy paid through the purchaser was treated as a separate support arrangement and not part of the rigs&#039; sale price, so it could not be included in assessable value. The article also notes that where the price list and returns were disclosed and approved, a differential duty demand raised nearly two years later could not invoke the extended limitation period absent proof of suppression. The connected duty demand and penalty were therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>