<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 155 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92602</link>
    <description>Where identical questions of law have already been referred in a connected matter, the Tribunal may allow a further reference of the same issues to the High Court for opinion. Applying that principle, the Tribunal found that the questions arising from its final order also warranted reference because the same legal issue was already pending in another reference. The reference application was allowed and the framed questions were referred to the Madhya Pradesh High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:39:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 155 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92602</link>
      <description>Where identical questions of law have already been referred in a connected matter, the Tribunal may allow a further reference of the same issues to the High Court for opinion. Applying that principle, the Tribunal found that the questions arising from its final order also warranted reference because the same legal issue was already pending in another reference. The reference application was allowed and the framed questions were referred to the Madhya Pradesh High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>