<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 153 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92600</link>
    <description>Exemption notifications must be strictly construed according to their express terms, and benefit cannot be extended by implication to goods not specifically covered. Notification No. 220/86-C.E. granted exemption to jigs and fixtures, but it did not expressly extend that relief to parts of jigs and fixtures. On that basis, the parts were held ineligible for exemption and duty relief was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:34:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 153 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92600</link>
      <description>Exemption notifications must be strictly construed according to their express terms, and benefit cannot be extended by implication to goods not specifically covered. Notification No. 220/86-C.E. granted exemption to jigs and fixtures, but it did not expressly extend that relief to parts of jigs and fixtures. On that basis, the parts were held ineligible for exemption and duty relief was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>