https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92598 The tribunal classified the imported goods under Chapter Heading 4809.90 instead of 4908.10 due to the absence of visible printing. It determined that a specific license was required for the goods, contrary to the appellants' claim of falling under Open General License provisions. Despite reducing the redemption fine to Rs. One lakh and penalty to Rs. 50,000 based on consistency with prior imports, the tribunal upheld the confiscation and penalties, emphasizing the necessity of a license for certain products under 4809.90. en-us Fri, 29 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:29:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92598 The tribunal classified the imported goods under Chapter Heading 4809.90 instead of 4908.10 due to the absence of visible printing. It determined that a specific license was required for the goods, contrary to the appellants' claim of falling under Open General License provisions. Despite reducing the redemption fine to Rs. One lakh and penalty to Rs. 50,000 based on consistency with prior imports, the tribunal upheld the confiscation and penalties, emphasizing the necessity of a license for certain products under 4809.90. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 29 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92598