<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92592</link>
    <description>Approved classification lists govern central excise levy until their correctness is challenged by a show cause notice. Where the proper officer has already approved the classification list, differential duty for a prior period cannot be recovered as a short levy merely by revisiting that approval under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. On the facts stated, the demand for the past six months was therefore not sustainable and the appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:15:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92592</link>
      <description>Approved classification lists govern central excise levy until their correctness is challenged by a show cause notice. Where the proper officer has already approved the classification list, differential duty for a prior period cannot be recovered as a short levy merely by revisiting that approval under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. On the facts stated, the demand for the past six months was therefore not sustainable and the appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>